Monday 24 October 2011

Fight Global Warming ADGRPID:|SERVTYPE: Are Managers exempt?

Article Summary: Managers typically don't receive overtime because they're exempt. Employers often assume that their management trainees fall into the same category and are exempt. They don't, and they aren't.
Managers typically don't receive overtime because they're exempt. Employers often assume that their management trainees fall into the same category and are exempt. They don't, and they aren't.

This mistake is more significant now because under the Obama administration, the Department of Labor has increased its efforts to crack down on employers who misclassify employees as exempt. Also, recently, the "hottest" litigation for plaintiffs' attorneys is wage and hour lawsuits. Because this issue arises under federal law, it applies to employers whether they operate in Indiana or in other states.

Basic Rule

Two common exemptions are the executive and administrative. An employee who meets all the requirements of either is exempt. Managers often qualify for one or both. Although the FLSA doesn't address managers in training, a regulation provides that a management trainee must meet all the requirements of either exemption to be exempt from overtime. The bar isn't lowered simply because the employee is in training.

Another common misconception by employers is the mere fact they're paying someone a salary means that person is exempt from overtime. This too is incorrect. Being paid a salary is only one of multiple requirements that must be met for an employee to be exempt.

Executive and Administrative Exemptions

To qualify for either the executive or administrative exemption, an employee must receive at least $455 per week on a salary basis and meet other primary duty requirements. Although time isn't determinative, a good rule of thumb is that the primary duty is the duty on which the employee spends more than 50% of his time.

To meet the executive exemption, the employee's primary duty must be management of a department or subdivision of the business; he must regularly direct at least two full-time employees or their equivalent; and he must have authority to hire and fire, or his recommendations on changes of status must be given particular weight.

To meet the administrative exemption, the employee's primary duty must be the performance of office or non-manual work directly related to management or general business operations of the employer or its customers; and that primary duty must include exercising discretion and independent judgment on matters of significance. Exercising discretion and independent judgment entails the comparison and evaluation of possible courses of action and making a decision after considering them.

Why Management Trainees Usually Aren't Exempt

Management trainees often meet the $455 weekly salary requirement but fail to satisfy one or more of the other requirements for either the executive or administrative exemption.

For example, a management trainee may shadow a manager who is in charge of a department or subdivision of the business. However, if the trainee isn't in charge of a department or subdivision, doesn't supervise at least two full-time employees or their equivalent (shared responsibility isn't sufficient), or doesn't have the authority to hire and fire or have meaningful input into changes of status, the trainee doesn't satisfy the other exemption requirements. Simply being present when the manager interviews, discharges, disciplines, or evaluates other employees isn't sufficient.

Management trainees also often fail to satisfy other requirements for the administrative exemption. For example, a trainee may shadow a manager who exercises discretion and independent judgment. However, if the trainee doesn't exercise discretion and independent judgment, or doesn't make any decisions or recommendations but simply follows instructions or procedures, he doesn't satisfy the other exemption requirements.

"Management or general business operations" doesn't include production or sales. To satisfy the second requirement, the employee must assist with the running of the business.

Conclusion

If you consider your management trainees to be exempt, carefully review whether they satisfy all the requirements of at least one exemption. If they qualify for either the executive or administrative exemption, they're not entitled to overtime. On the other hand, if they don't satisfy all the requirements of at least one exemption, they're entitled to overtime for all hours they work over 40 in a week at one and one half times their regular rate. Thus, for example, if the management trainee is paid a salary of $600 a week and worked 50 hours then his regular rate is $12 an hour ($600/50 hrs.) and his overtime rate is $18 for all hours over 40 using the fluctuating work week method of calculating overtime. In this example, he would be entitled to $600 plus $180 in overtime pay for a total of $780. The more hours your management trainees work, the greater the potential liability. Consult with employment counsel if you're unsure as mistakes in this area can be costly.

Fight Global Warming ADGRPID:|SERVTYPE: The Duty to Warn in Boating Accident Injury Cases

Article Summary: In the hot steaming summer months, many Toronto residents head for the beaches or set off for holiday outings at the local lodge for a spell of much needed rest and relaxation But all too often, a planned trip of leisure at the lake can turn into an occasion for catastrophic injury, with all the attendant legal damages and financial loss that might follow
In the hot steaming summer months, many Toronto residents head for the beaches or set off for holiday outings at the local lodge for a spell of much needed rest and relaxation. But all too often, a planned trip of leisure at the lake can turn into an occasion for catastrophic injury, with all the attendant legal damages and financial loss that might follow.



While guests are often presumed by lodge owners to assume, and consent to, a risk of possible injury when operating a vessel on open water, special circumstances might apply in boating accident cases where lodge owners have been deemed to fail in their duty to provide warnings about known dangers - a warning that might be particularly relevant to guests with relatively sophisticated navigational skills.



In the British Columbia Supreme Court decision of Cuppen v. Queen Charlotte Lodge Ltd., for instance, the Court awarded the plaintiff damages in respect of injuries sustained in a boating accident at a lodge. In this case, the defendant lodge asserted that the plaintiff "knew of and consented to the risk of possible injuries in operating a vessel." Moreover, the injured guest was deemed by the Court to be a relatively experienced passenger, presumably cognizant of the dangers inherent in recreational navigation. Why, then, would the Court impose liability on the lodge in this instance?



In Cuppen, the injured plaintiff asserted that the defendant lodge was negligent in equipping its boat with "a defective steering system." According to the plaintiff, the lodge had a duty to warn about dangers it ought to have been aware of at the time. Yet in this case, the Court determined that the "nature or cause of the defect" was unclear, and further, that the plaintiff was unable to show that the defect was caused by the negligent conduct of the lodge. As the Court noted:



While I am satisfied that there was a defect in the boat, it is not possible to determine the nature or cause of the defect. I am not able to infer that the defect itself arose from the lodge's actions. The defect may have been caused by the manufacturer of the steering system. The evidence does not allow me to exclude this as a possible cause of the defect in the boat. Therefore, the plaintiff has not satisfied me that the defect itself was due to negligence by the lodge.



However, I am satisfied that the lodge had a duty to warn [the plaintiff] of dangers it knew or ought to have known of in using the boats.



So here we have a case where a guest at a lodge - who was sophisticated in the ways of recreational boating - was unable to show that the defect causing his injury was due to the defendant's negligence - yet was still able to prevail upon the court to successfully award him damages for his personal injury. How could this be?



The Court determined that the lodge had failed in its duty to warn of dangers that it ought to have known of. As the evidence showed, the lodge had previously "received reports of ‘unexplained' problems guests were experiencing with the boats" - two of which specifically referred to possible defects in the steering mechanism. The fault of the lodge lay in the fact that it did not convey warnings to its other guests upon receiving notification of possible dangers, so that the guests - in the court's words - would be able to maintain a state of "vigilance", taking certain added precautions to avoid possible injury even while assuming the risks of taking a boat out on the water.



In this case, the fact of the injured plaintiff's relative experience and sophistication with boats worked against the interests of the defendant lodge. As the Court saw it, it was precisely the lodge's failure to warn of possible dangers that resulted in injury insofar as the plaintiff was not accorded the benefit of his experience to maintain a state of precautionary vigilance in the light of such warnings. In other words, he might very well have avoided the injury had the lodge responsibly conveyed warnings pertaining to the prior guest complaints.



The Court grounded its reasoning on the Supreme Court of Canada decision of Hollis v. Birch, noting that:



…a manufacturer of a product has a duty to warn customers of dangers it knows or ought to know are inherent in the products used. The duty is a continuing one, requiring manufacturers to warn not only of dangers known at the time of sale, but also of dangers discovered after the product has been sold and delivered.



Proceeding from those principles, the Court went on to impose a "high onus" on the lodge to warn of possible dangers, even if not sufficiently explained by the guests reporting them:



…given the danger inherent in the use of a boat on the open water and the likelihood of injuries should the guest experience difficulty with steering, such as that described in the reports, there was a high onus on [the defendant] Lodge to alert its guests to the possible problem. The lodge would have the same duty to warn, whether the steering difficulty which I have described is considered a defect (as I have concluded) or merely a feature of the boat.



In answering the defendant's assertion that the plaintiff voluntarily assumed the risk of possible injury, the Court concluded:



[The Plaintiff] did not agree to waive any claim for negligence against the lodge. He was not warned of the difficulty other guests were experiencing with the boats, so was not aware of the specific risks. He did not consent to accept the risk of injury. This defence fails.



So what have we learned from this decision? From the defendant's point of view, when operating a business that supplies vessels for use on open water, any prior reports of possible defects should be conveyed as warnings to future customers. From the plaintiff's point of view, a personal injury lawyer would do well to investigate records pertaining to prior complaints, in order to assess whether a defendant has failed in its duty to take certain precautions to warn its customers to avoid the possibility of injury.

How To Avoid Harassing Phone Calls From Creditor?

Article Summary: At one time or other most people have already been reached by a bill collector. Many of us did not remember to settle or fall overdue on payments for mortgages, medical bills, credit cards, cars or maybe many other aspects regarding the bills. This will eventually make us to have a call through the collector.
At one time or other most people have already been reached by a bill collector. Many of us did not remember to settle or fall overdue on payments for mortgages, medical bills, credit cards, cars or maybe many other aspects regarding the bills. This will eventually make us to have a call through the collector.



Your creditors prefer to collect the debts due by you by any methods and they make calls for your workplace or your house. This is amongst the several factors why most of the people refrain from debt.



Here I will discuss few guidelines to avoid the creditor harassment:



Initial thing to discontinue the lender harassment will be to mention each dealing with your collector. Make a note of what your collector speaks to you and as well your response to that. You may also record the phone call, but you need to inform your lender that you're doing this. Just tell that "I am recording the conversation to defend my legal rights". This may ultimately warns your lender and also you can preserve yourself from becoming indicted of illegal wiretapping.



You can also contact an attorney to get any support. If you are at home, you may overlook the lender harassment phone calls. However when you are at the job, your co-workers and your manager will probably monitor plus it results in a bad effects on your work performance and your job level. Talking to a good attorney will help to file the complaint against collector harassment and you'll get a quick stop on your lender harassment. In this you have to look for an experienced lawyer that can deal with this sort of circumstance.



Then provide an approved note for your lender. In the note, speak to your current collector to stop the phone calls to your house and workplace. In addition state the fair debt collection practice act, that is the legal system produced to give protection to the person against the lender even if the calls proceed after giving the letter. In addition maintain a copy of the notice and the signed return notice for your records. This file can be needed if you would like to file a lawsuit against the collector.



If you get a chance, talk with your collector and strive to discuss your problem. Request the creditor to review about the debt repayment plan or even a complete settlement of the debt at stated time in the future. In this, it is very important keep calm when you really want to take the advantage of all those options. Request any guidelines.



Life will likely be difficult with such creditor harassments and can influence your peace of mind. In case you certainly can't pay the debt and like to seek the assistance of a attorney, you can contact an expert debt settlement attorney. A debt relief lawyer who's processed cases just like yours will help you quite a lot in relieving the debt and also the lender harassment. Consider everything that may help you to prevent such type of aggravating issues. Ask the attorney exactly how bankruptcy will improve your state.

Is partnership agreement legal contract?

Article Summary: Partnership agreement is a legally binding contract. Partnership agreement involves two or more co-owners( up to a 20) participating together in a business with an intention to make and share profits, and an understanding that these co-owners act on behalf of each other in the business.
Partnership Agreement

There are a different business structures that you can opt from when setting up your business. The four main forms of business structures commonly used by small businesses are:

- Sole trader: an individual trading on their own.

- Partnership: an association of people or entities carrying on a business together, but not as a company.

- Trust: an entity that holds property or income for the benefit of others.

- Company: a legal entity separate from its shareholders.

Every business structure has pros and cons. But you must choose that business structure that best compatible with your business requirements. You are required to investigate each business option carefully before choosing a business structure. Because it is an important decision that can determine the licenses you will need to operate.

Partnership agreement is a legally binding contract. Partnership agreement involves two or more co-owners( up to a 20) participating together in a business with an intention to make and share profits, and an understanding that these co-owners (or partners) act on behalf of each other in the business.

There are number of advantages attribute to partnership such as few government regulation; tax advantages;share risk ; no need to disclose information to public ; inexpensive to set up; more people to share work load and more people to share losses and business risks

In Australia, each state has its own partnership law such as:

- ACT - Partnership Act 1963

- NSW - Partnership Act 1892

- NT - Partnership Act 1997

- QLD - Partnership Act 1891

- SA - Partnership Act 1891

- TAS - Partnership Act 1891

The partnership law clearly explains the rules on how to set up a partnership. The Partnership law does not require that partnership contract must be in written form. Partnership agreement can be made orally. But to avoid the disputes it is good practice that you must enter into a written partnership agreement with your prospective partner. A written partnership form can be used as a point of reference in the case of disputes between the partners. Therefore a written partnership contract is a key document in any partnership.

The partnership agreement can also give all partners a clearer understanding of their rights, responsibilities and obligations as a partner. It is advisable to review your partnership agreement regularly.

The mutual rights and duties of partners, whether ascertained by partnership agreement or defined by the Partnership Act, may be varied by the consent of all the partners, and such consent may be either expressed or inferred from a course of dealing.

Partnership agreement template commonly covers a number of matters, including:

- the nature and purpose of the business ;

- capital contributions of each partner (cash as well as non-cash contributions such as time) ;

- profit and loss allocation ;

- authority of each partner ;

- how to admit new partners ;

- what happens if a partner dies (sometimes the business is dissolved and liquidated but not always) ;

- how to buy out a partner's share - when one or more partners wish to exit the business, for example ;

- signature authority on the business's bank accounts;

- How conflicts will be resolved.

The major disadvantage of the partnership is unlimited liability of the partners because every partner is jointly and severally liable in the partnership. In the partnership agreement, you and other partner may define the nature of liability but legally each partner liability towards creditor is unlimited. As a partner you are not only liable for your own acts, but also for the acts of your partners, over which you may have little or no control.

No majority of the partners can expel any partner unless a power to do so has been conferred by express agreement between the partners. Where the partnership agreement does not specify the duration of partnership then the other party may retire from the partnership by giving notice to other partner for such purpose. The partnership agreement that does not specify the term of partnership is called partnership at will.

Partnership law dose not allow the partners to carry on the same business as of the partnership without the consent of the other partners. If any partner carries on the same business then he must pay the all profits to the firm that is gained by that business.

The partnership can be dissolved subject to the partnership agreement:

- If entered into for a fixed term, by the expiration of that term;

- If entered into for a single adventure or undertaking, by the termination of that adventure or undertaking;

- If entered into for an undefined time, by any partner giving notice to the other or others of the partner's intention to dissolve the partnership.

Fight Global Warming ADGRPID:|SERVTYPE: Zadroga Attorney is the Lawful Guide

Article Summary: Zadroga attorney is the best man, who has the ideal knowledge of the subject and has the ability to create legal magic.
One should provide sufficient information about the case to Zadroga attorney with details about your medical expenditure, documents and prescriptions given by the doctor for helping him in developing a triumphant case in your favor. It is essential that the claimant should not hide anything from his lawyer as it can work against them. Providing him with genuine information augments your opportunity of getting the claim. It has been noticed that many people scheme fake illness through 9/11 incident and try to get money out from government. But, this deception can result in strict legal actions on the illusory party and make things worse. Only a veteran and well knowledgeable Zadroga attorney can handle this composite case competently and can answer all the questions that are asked from him by the judges in the court. Before taking on the support of a Zadroga Attorney, one should always check the identification of the lawyer that has to be hired.



A Zadroga attorney also states that it is imperative to note that the bodily harm must be confirmed by the medical practitioner providing current medical care. Claimants are, generally, allowed 2 years to present a claim as of the date the system are made in print. Along with this, Zadroga attorney also tells that a person, who consequently learns of bodily harm, must file the claim as soon as he gets to know about the published regulations by the United States Government and should also know that his physical disorder has resulted because of the terror attacks of 9/11. The point of concern is that the people suffering from a deadly disease because of 9/11 should take legal backing from a proficient Zadroga attorney. Though, before you settle on availing the services of any concerned attorney, you must authenticate his credentials and get a meticulous report about his experience, aptitude and other essential aspects. Zadroga attorney helps the victims to take pecuniary help in the form of remunerate. By sanctioning Zadroga Act; New York government has taken pretty useful steps. They also helps in getting thorough knowledge of introduction health estimation such as program eligibility, health monitoring.



To maintain the laws and rights of such families and also the victims, Zadroga attorney is always sought after. In fact, he is known to be the agent of the commandments associated with the victims and enabling them to get the rightful compensation. The prime proviso of Zadroga law is that it gives reimburse to two groups of victims. The first group of Zadroga law beneficiary, according to the Zadroga attorney, is the preliminary responder of the terror strikes. This might encompass of the fire fighting recruits, police employees, paramedics and also volunteers. In case of this grouping of people, if they have got unyielding problems, Zadroga law has situation that would make confident compensate for their medical treatment. The second group of people together with this in the group of Zadroga law includes the dwellers of the district of the twin towers, who happened to inhale the toxic material during the clean up task.